Public, private, and hybrid cloud
An overview of the main models and the criteria useful for choosing the one best suited to public administrations.
Define the migration strategy Go to page means choosing how to move applications and data to the cloud commensurate with the expected value and available resources. There is no absolute best strategy: the decision is made on a per-service basis after the assessment Go to page , considering priorities, time, budget, skills and constraints.
A decision is made not to migrate an application but to set a review date. It is useful with newly purchased software, technical dependencies that cannot be overcome, lack of SaaS alternatives (Software as a Service) or security requirements that require on-premise (on their own servers) permanence.
Applications that are no longer useful or redundant are decommissioned. This strategy requires careful management of historical data and verification of dependencies before final shutdown.
You replace the software installed on your servers with a qualified SaaS solution. This choice eliminates infrastructure management, accelerates upgrades, and shifts the focus from technical maintenance to service utilization.
You move the application to the cloud without major changes to the code (approach lift & shift), often using automated migration tools. It is the fastest approach but does not take advantage of cloud capabilities: it requires a subsequent optimization phase to reduce costs and improve performance.
You migrate the application to the cloud by replacing some components with managed services (e.g., database, load balancers, storage). It brings targeted benefits in reliability, scalability and maintenance through incremental and measurable transformations.
You redesign the application from a cloud-native perspective to maximize scalability, resilience and speed of evolution. This is the most challenging approach because it requires time, specialized skills, automated testing and progressive releases, but it is the one recommended for the organization's strategic systems.
The choice is based on the assessment of each service. In practice, the entity evaluates service role, technical dependencies, code status, frequency of use, security and interoperability requirements, as well as cost and time. A rule of thumb to keep in mind is this: the greater the transformation, the greater the benefit to the entity, but it will also mean more time, expertise and budget.
It is therefore convenient to define measurable objectives, constraints, and available resources for each application, choosing the option that offers the best ratio of expected benefits to required effort. It is often effective to combine multiple strategies for different components of the same system.
Yes.The choice is made for each component based on priority, impact, and technical or regulatory constraints. In many cases it is useful to combine different approaches to achieve rapid and progressive benefits.
Data is not lost: it is migrated to a cloud storage or archive with defined access and retention rules. After checking dependencies, the application is decommissioned and only what is needed for consultation or regulatory obligations is kept.
Responsibility is shared. Qualified providers ensure infrastructure and services according to common requirements. Administration defines requirements, manages identities and access, maintains configurations, and periodically verifies security and continuity levels.
An overview of the main models and the criteria useful for choosing the one best suited to public administrations.
The concrete benefits for public administrations: efficiency, security, interoperability, and service continuity.
How to optimize cloud usage and monitor costs, consumption, and operational responsibilities over time.
Hi, was this page helpful?